<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Business on Akshay Deshpande</title>
    <link>https://akshayd-dev.pages.dev/tags/business/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Business on Akshay Deshpande</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://akshayd-dev.pages.dev/tags/business/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Observability - Metrics Madness</title>
      <link>https://akshayd-dev.pages.dev/posts/observability-metrics-madness/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://akshayd-dev.pages.dev/posts/observability-metrics-madness/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There isn&amp;rsquo;t a single book or article on observability (O11y) where there isn&amp;rsquo;t a mention of MELT. (Metrics, Events, Traces, Logs)&lt;br&gt;
While these four are the building blocks of telemetry data in Observability, all the four components haven&amp;rsquo;t evolved at the same rate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this write-up, I delve into metrics in observability (mainly custom metrics) and argue how the overuse of metrics is turning into madness and directly impacting the cost of observability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
